Sushant Singh Rajput | Real Solution of Nepotism | One Year Later |


"Hello, friends! "  Today's the 14th of June.  It has been exactly one year since  we lost Sushant Singh Rajput.  "A very talented actor, a superb dancer"  and an entertainer that had a lot of interest in things like space and quantum mechanics.  He enjoyed watching stars and planets with his enormous telescope.  "A rare celebrity on whose social media,"  you'd find everything from cryptic philosophical posts to poetry.  He had many dreams.  "In fact, he was an entire world in and of himself."  "The day when we got to know of his death,"  not only Bollywood but also the entire country was shocked.  Everyone was shocked when they got to know about it.  "And after his death, the topic 'Nepotism' was much talked about."  Nepotism was a topic that was slandered a lot.  While some jobless people used it for their own publicity.  "At other places, it became political fodder."  But nowhere did we see any constructive debate on Nepotism.  About the solutions to counter this problem.  "In today's  Blog, friends, I'd like to speak on this topic."  And talk about these solutions.  What exactly is Nepotism?  How can we counter it? 

Let's try to find out in today's  Blog.  Nepotism is a topic that came to the forefront even a few years ago  when three celebrities said this in an award show.  """Nepotism Rocks!"""  """Nepotism Rocks!"" ""Nepotism Rocks!"""  What sense did it have?  How can a thing like Nepotism be celebrated?  Should they have said 'nepotism rocks' or 'talent rocks'?  "Friends, there are some celebrities that"  compare nepotism with quota.  Like some people get a quota (or reservation) while giving an exam  and they want nepotism to be considered as such.  """In the entrance test, I had a particular quota,"  "star kid children, they have 30% quota."""  Not only this some celebrities also believe that  nepotism helps to get the first film only.  "After which, only the person's talent plays a role."  "Someone should ask them, is it that easy to get the first film?"  "For an outsider, it is a huge achievement to get the first film in Bollywood."  They have to struggle tirelessly to reach that point.  These are the arguments used to justify nepotism.  The second question here is  to what extent do we get to see nepotism?  Let's talk of the Bollywood industry first.  "First, the entire Kapoor family."  Prithvi Raj Kapoor's son Raj Kapoor.  Raj Kapoor's son Rishi Kapoor.  And Rishi Kapoor's son Ranbir Kapoor.  Raj Kapoor's other son Randhir Kapoor.  Randhir Kapoor's daughter Kareena Kapoor.  "Second, Sharmila Tagore's son Saif Ali Khan."  And Saif Ali Khan's daughter Sara Ali Khan.  The third is the family of Dharmendra.  His sons Sunny Deol and Bobby Deol.  His daughter Esha Deol.  His nephew Abhay Deol.  "And now Sunny Deol's son has also debuted, Karan Deol."  He got a role in one of the latest movies.  The lead role.   "Other than this, Suniel Dutt's son Sanjay Dutt."  Amitabh Bachchan's son Abhishek Bachchan.  Rakesh Roshan's son Hrithik Roshan.  There are so many examples in Bollywood of this  that one has to look thoroughly to find the outsiders.  Where and who is an outsider?  Among the few names that come to my mind  "is of Sushant Singh Rajput himself,"  one would be Ayushmann Khurrana.  Another is Rajkumar Rao.  Now I'd like to ask you a critical question.  Should we count only the children of the actors and actresses among 'Star Kids' for nepotism?  "The famous filmmakers, directors and writers,"  shouldn't their children getting roles offered be also counted for nepotism?  Like filmmaker Mahesh Bhatt's daughter Alia Bhatt.  Who has become a superstar now. 

Shall she be also counted for nepotism?  There are many more examples of this.  Salim Khan's son Salman Khan.  Javed Akhter's son Farhan Akhter.  "In fact, Amir Khan's father and uncle were film producer and filmmaker."  Now I'd like to take this question a step further.  Politician's children who've become actors.  Riteish Deshmukh.  His father Vilas Rao Deshmukh was the Chief Minister of Maharashtra for two terms.  Did he use his power to help his son become an actor or to get a film?  What do you think?  Had nepotism played a role here as well?  "Actually, let's go a step further."  If a superstar's parents aren't Bollywood insiders or politicians themselves  but they have a very close connection with politicians and Bollywood insiders  Amitabh Bachchan's father the legendary poet Harivansh Rai Bachchan  and his mother Teji Bachchan.  It's believed that they had a very close connection with the former Prime Minister  Indira Gandhi.  And look at this photo. 

Shah Rukh Khan's mother is standing with the PM Indira Gandhi.  "Can it be possible that at the beginning of his career,"  Shah Rukh Khan might've gotten some help because of this connection?  Maybe. Maybe not.  "But I'd like to tell you one fact,"  Shah Rukh Khan and Irfan Khan had started out around the same time.  "But ever since the beginning, Shah Rukh Khan got lead roles first in TV and later in films."  But Irfan Khan had to wait for 15 years  to get lead roles in films.  There's a similar story involving Amitabh Bachchan as well.  "Ever since he landed in Bombay, he has been getting lead roles."  "So definitely, the topic of nepotism arises here as well."  Do the influential people use their connections  to help their children in such a way  that is unfair to the rest?  "Till now, I've talked about the connections only."  What happens if money is used to get this unfair advantage?  Should that be counted as nepotism too?  Suppose Vijay Mallaya wants to launch his son Siddharth Mallaya in a lead role in a Bollywood film  How difficult will it be for him to do so?  He has unimaginable wealth.  There are some connections as well.  But his wealth is his strength.  It will be very easy for him to do this.  "Actually friends, in my opinion, all these examples"  will fall into the category of nepotism.  To a different degree.  "In some, there is only a little nepotism." 

"In others, nepotism plays a significant role."  Here I'd like to clarify one thing before moving on with the  Blog.  I'm not saying that I'm against all the Star Kids that have come through nepotism.  There are many star kids  who might've used nepotism to some degree  but they are quite talented.  "Shah Rukh Khan, Amir Khan are very talented actors."  Vicky Kaushal is the son of a very famous action director.  He's very talented.  Konkana Sen.  Not only talented but there are also many hard-working people.  "But, friends, the concern here is that"  talent should be supported.  It shouldn't matter if one is an insider or an outsider.  As long as the talent is being supported.  "And second, the outsiders,"  are they getting equal opportunity to rise to the same level?  Maybe not.  And this isn't in Bollywood only.  It is evident in several other sectors in the country.  Just look at politics.  The Gandhi family in politics.  "Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi."  It's quite a long tradition here.  Does anyone other than a member of the Gandhi family  get the same opportunity to rise to the same level in the Congress party?  This is the most famous example that everyone knows about.  "But in reality, there are many other examples as well."  Rajesh Pilot's son Sachin Pilot.  Lalu Prasad Yadav's son Tejasvi Yadav.  Mulayam Singh Yadav's son Akhilesh Yadav.  "And a party like BJP too, that projects itself as being against nepotism,"  "has politicians Jyotiraditya Scindia, Varun Gandhi, Anurag Thakur."  "In fact, in 2019's Lok Sabha, friends"  approx 30% MPs of the Lok Sabha  belong to some political family or the other.  "Basically, one-third of our politicians."  The political families don't just favour having their children being politicians only.  Rather there are even examples  "like of Amit Shah's son Jay Shah,"  who has reached one of the top posts in the BCCI.  Could this have been possible without any influence?  Is this not nepotism?  "Of course, it is."  Let's move on from politics to journalism. 

Here too will you get to see such examples.  Vidya Vilas Purie co-founded the Thomson Press in 1967.  "And later, its chairman was his son Aroon Purie."  "And currently, its Managing Director is Ankur Purie."  The son of Aroon Purie.  India Today magazine was also started by him in 1975.  In which the founding publisher was again his son Aroon Purie.  His daughter Madhu was the founding editor.  "And in October 2017, Aroon Purie gave his daughter Kalli Purie the post of Vice-Chairperson."  The same story can be seen in those media organizations as well  that claim to be the most vocal against nepotism.  "In Republic TV,"  a journalist that resigned from Republic TV had accused the organization  that though Arnab Goswami is the head there  but the operations are actually managed by Arnab Goswami's wife.  """His wife, being Arnab's wife,"  she has every right to be in the organization.  I'm nobody to challenge it.  "But when you have the galls to lecture other people about Nepotism,"  when you're saying 'why this so-called star son has become a star'  so then you should also have the courage  "to practice whatever you're preaching to others."""  "Friends, nepotism like this is present not only in"  "the politics, journalism and Bollywood, it also in our law and justice system."  Look at the screen.  There are several Hon’ble Supreme Court judges  "in whose family someone or the other,"  "either someone's father or uncle, had been a Judge in Supreme Court."  "Here again, I'd like to reiterate,"  I'm not saying that these Supreme Court judges  are in any way less intelligent or less qualified.  These are very highly qualified and intelligent judges. 

But I'm asking just this  "because someone in their family had been a judge in the Supreme Court,"  did they not have some sort of an unfair advantage over other people?  "Of course, they did have some."  The same thing can be seen with doctors.  "When someone in the family is a doctor,"  they can easily help their children become doctors.  Business is another field where this is evident.  Where often it is the children of the businessmen  that become the next Chairperson or CEO.  "Apart from all these, Money Nepotism also plays a huge role here."  "The children born to rich families,"  life is relatively easier for them to quite an extent.  "Nowadays if someone is born into a rich family,"  suppose Abhishek Bachchan's daughter says  that she wants to become a commercial pilot  "but it will cost crores to get the license,"  they can definitely afford to pay for it.  If Shah Rukh Khan's son says tomorrow that  "though he has failed the entrance exam of the college,"  "he still wants to study in the same field,"  they can very easily afford to get an education from the best but expensive private schools in the world.  "And friends, the interesting thing is that this"  applies to all of our lives to various extent and levels.  "Now, I'm from a middle-class family."  "If I tell my parents that I want to drop studies for one year and focus only on YouTube,"  my parents do have enough money that they can afford to feed me and house me. 

"Even if I don't work or earn for a year, they can easily afford to pay for my expenses."  But if a son of a poor family says this  "that he wants to focus on YouTube and will not work for a year,"  a poor family living in the slums cannot afford this.  They will not be free to do it.  They will need to work and earn.  So they may never be able to afford such careers.  This is known as Privilege.  All of us have some privileges in our lives at varying degrees.  "On a personal individual level,"  we should be thankful for this privilege.  And this same thing is applicable to all these Superstar Kids that  have come into the industry through their connections and influences.  That got the right opportunities.  The best response from them might be that  they acknowledge their privilege  and acknowledge that the outsiders cannot   get opportunities of this level  that they have gotten an opportunity that 99% of the people will not get  and that they are grateful for it.  "But by doing this, it doesn't stop here."  What of those children from the families living in poverty?  Living in slums?  Those that don't even have wholesome water to drink at their homes.  Their houses do not get electricity properly.  They don't have access to proper health facilities.  They don't have access to good education.  They are forced to grow up in those conditions. 

"And it is 10 times, 100 times more difficult for them to rise up to this level."  "Yes, there certainly are some examples and inspirational stories"  "like Dr A.P.J. Abdul Kalam,"  "he used to sell newspapers initially,"  he started from the very bottom and grew to the level that he reached.  "But friends, it is important for us to know that"  these examples are very very very rare.  We can't use these examples to show that  "if he could, you can do it too."  "If we start saying this to the poor people,"  it wouldn't make their lives better.  We need to give them equal opportunities.  But do you know the real problem?  "When it is tried to have an equal starting line for all,"  some people start blaming these underprivileged families.  "When the Government tries to give free electricity, free education, free healthcare, free water"  "to the poor people,"  "or free scholarships and free schemes,"  "or tries to create reservations for them,"  then some people start calling these people freeloaders.  They taunt them at using free facilities.  That they don't want to get things themselves and are all freeloaders.  Such things are said to them.  Think for a minute.  Is it not our hypocrisy to blame them?  And to blame government schemes?  When it is tried to make the same starting line.  "For the solutions to deal with the issue of Nepotism,"  "if we can take inspiration from someone,"

 it can be no other than Sushant Singh Rajput himself.  "In Sushant's Dreams list,"  there were several projects like  sending more than 100 underprivileged kids to NASA or ISRO to train.  He wanted to encourage such things.  "And when he gave his views on nepotism,"  he had said this.  " ""Nepotism is there, is there, is everywhere."  It's not just in Bollywood.  So nepotism can coexist.  And nothing would happen.  "But at the same time, if"  you deliberately don't allow  "right talent to come up,"  "then there is a problem."""  He had accepted that nepotism is a reality.  And it can be seen everywhere in almost every aspect of life.  "When you have kids,"  you will try your best to give them the best possible life.  There's nothing wrong with it.  Sushant Singh Rajput believed that  nepotism can coexist.  But the focus should be on creating the same starting line.  To give a fair chance to other people.  That is the most important thing.  "In his life, he worked hard to achieve this."  "So I believe, that if you really love him and respect him"  then learn from him.  "Uselessly trolling, starting trends on Twitter"  "and abusing other actors and superstars, will lead you nowhere."  Learn from him and in a positive way  try to help underprivileged people in different aspects and fields of life.  Try to bring equality of opportunity in society.  And encourage and pressurize the government to do the same.  Doing this will truly be the most respectful thing you can do for Sushant Singh Rajput.  I hope you've liked the blog friends.  Let's meet in the next blog.  Thank you very much!


Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post